
In the last decade we have seen the proliferation of Web 2.0 technologies, digital media, and post-PCs change the way we access information, communicate and interact with one another. With subscription to social media channels in the hundreds of millions, and the growing global popularity of creating and exchanging user-generated content, marketing among other disciplines has transformed at this intersection of technology.
User-generated content – hosted on various social media sites – command hundreds of millions of hits a day – it’s counter-intuitive to ignore so many voices and marketers only have to listen to hear the countless conversations that stakeholders, customers and employees are having about their brands. The “social web” has become the catch-all term for the kind of horizontal engagement that unites subscribers with their mutual interests via social media channels such as: blogs, forums, social networking sites, listservs, multimedia, or chat rooms.
Marketing intelligence, sentiment research, public relations, and other sub-disciplines of marketing are beginning to use the social web extensively. This exponential growth of the social web and its subsequent effect on marketing communications among others, calls for exploratory scientific classification, a framework to broadly categorize social media.
We can draw three basic conceptual distinctions of how myriad social media outlets help consumers to interact and distribute information: 1. generating; 2. preserving; 3. derived social web usage. We can further divide each category along the lines of media profusion and type of engagement.
1. Generating Social Web User
The creators of content can pontificate about subjects of interest to them and host a commentary space for viewer, reader, or buyer responses, where the emphasis is on social interaction, such as: likes or +1s, favorites, comments, etc.
Typically, rich media sites (usually video- or photography-based social sites) are used to enthuse about subjects that engage them – creating a dialogue between users, readers, and buyers – with the emphasis on sharing and interacting with other social users.
Pre-eminently focused on personal reflection they will engage in blog style journals that contain user-created audio, visual or textual compositions with related, personally selected, media – typically from sites like Youtube, Vimeo and Daily Motion – linked to social media sites like Twitter, WordPress and Gawker to further develop an online identity and their personal web-based log.
Other content websites allow users to publish presentation slides, social e-mails, etc. eCommerce websites permit customers to sell, buy, and post reviews and pictures of products.
2. Preserving Social Web User
Preserving social web users look to forge and maintain relationship and geo-social capital by subscribing their online profiles with other users – with a view to creating a social network either publicly and privately.
Largely passive contributors to social media preserving users will maintain networks using sites like Linkedin, Google+, and Facebook to foster social relationships – professional or personal. Other social users maintain relationships through ‘marking’ sites like Foursquare to share, organize, and physically resource locations to enhance geography-based social capital.
3. Derived Social Web User
Creating a culture of self-disclosure this class of derived users seek to measure the extent of their social influence via products and services online using various feedback options to exert their power as consumers, users, loyalists, or advocates.
Reviewing, rating and recommending derived users are highly active, sharing their opinions in a social setting from sites like: Digg, Chowhound, Epinions, and Lonely Planet. Scores of websites tap into the power of social networking model. For instance, category social sites unite people who share similar interests, pursuits, professions, culture, geography, and demography.
With less emphasis on creating or buying online, other derived users will vet the quality of social content submitted online using sites such as Blogpulse.
The internet has truly revolutionized our access to information and our interactions with others – blurring the distinction between paradigms of media gatekeepers and passive audience participation to such a degree that, in and amongst the ideological and technological upheaval, social media has not only become a powerful broadcasting tool but the foundation by which we measure this upheaval.
Along with other disciplines, marketing, on a global scale, has been transformed by the intersection of technology and the social web. With more social networking sites being added to share interests, activities, backgrounds, or real-life connections, this taxonomy is only going to get more complex.
Sudio Sudarsan is a veteran in marketing engineering, and helps myriad fortune 500 firms across geographies, industries, and cultures to formulate robust brand strategies from research and analytics. He regularly teaches at Hult in Boston MA and San Francisco CA.
Thanks for posting a framework that classifies the digital jungle. Very useful to strategists and digital marketers!
Where was this article all my digital life? So glad I found this! Thank you very much Professor Sudarsan for this article. It was about time we had a classification of the social web done.
Being a technologist and avid follower of social media technologies from the early days such as Stumbleupon, Digg, Delicious to Facebook, Google+, Vimeo, and Quora, your classification is very apt yet brings a fresh perspective to delineate the social marketplace. I will certainly be referring to this in my presentations.
Thanks for posting this Professor Sudarsan! A concise, detailed step in mapping out the social market place. Its given me a fresh perspective on the social web, that i hope, as you piece outlines, to expand upon myself using this fantastic guide.
When we discover multifarious entities, it is of great import to arrange them in a series of nested classes. This sort of taxonomy helps our understanding of the social web. Linnaeus did biological classification, and Mendeleev with periodic tables. Now, Sudarsan does with social media websites.
An excellent article from Professor Sudarsan! SoLoMo – Social Local Mobile seems to be the new mantra for succeeding in a dynamic environment. This article goes to the foundation of your identity – as it is known and sought by marketers. P2P/ WOM had limitations – which appear to have been reduced in a digital space – where things go viral – if they are interesting to a critical mass.
Kudos to Sudio for formally classifying social web capabilities! Being the principal of a niche firm engaged in providing Collaboration, Content Management and Social Media solutions and services, I find Sudio’s Social Web framework a great starting point to categorize the various types of use cases. While I believe capabilities such as Facebook straddle between Categories 2 and 3, the framework largely captures broad categories of usage. I am looking forward to a more elaborate deep dive on this framework in the upcoming posts by Sudio.
Sudio,
You have shared a nice categorization of Social media. Having worked in the Web domain for a while and seeing the emergence of social media in continuation of the topic, I would like to share some of my experience. IMO two main challenges which an individual or company faces while participating in this domain are:
- How to process large amount of data which is or can be gathered from social media?
Traditional systems don’t scale and if you can’t analyze and take action quickly; it might do more harm than good for the cause. To facilitate, a new paradigm/technology under the umbrella of “Big Data Analysis” has emerged and tons of start-up and large corporation are helping customers solve it. My work at Yahoo was in the same space and the platform was called Hadoop and we were daily processing 120B events (these include any clicks, mouse overs etc.) and overall 200PB of data. One of the output in real time was how the ads changed on yahoo.com based on your preference, browsing pattern, etc.
- The other challenge is how to measure success of your investment in Social Media – Advertisement ROI
Lot of advertisement budget is moving to online and that is predominantly because you can measure the ROI. e.g. it is very difficult to say/measure how people walked into the store looking at the billboard 5 miles away, but is possible to do it online where you know exactly whom your displayed, who clicked and how much time they spent on a certain page etc. An example during my tenure was when Walmart asked us to look for certain age group people looking for certain items in a particular zipcode and they paid us after the realization of buying. Some overall guidelines can also be found at http://tinyurl.com/7a8mm54
Keep up the job and wish you great success.
Cheers,
A
This model is invaluable to me as a textbook author. I also admire your future trend slide decks. You are a great resource for anything social media related. Keep up the good work, Sudio!
I think many internet marketers will find this useful information. Interesting to see this overview of the web 2.0.
regards Manon